Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Hayward

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1981No. Civ. 47885PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

This is an appeal by retired public employees from a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate seeking an order compelling the City of Hayward and the Public Employees Retirement System (hereinafter PERS) to include certain “fringe benefits” in the salary base from which their pension allowances are computed. Appellants also appeal from an order entered by the trial court denying certification as a class action.

The parties have stipulated to the facts of the case. We summarize the relevant facts from that stipulation. The named plaintiffs in this action are a retired…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. Pacific Land Research Co.California Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Fireside Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API