People v. Siemsen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in .the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
John Siemsen and Louis Dabner were, by information filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, charged with the murder of M. Munekata. Upon a separate trial, Siemsen was found guilty of murder of the first degree, and he appeals from the judgment of death pronounced pursuant to the verdict, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. Upon being arraigned the defendant moved to set aside the information. His motion was denied, and this ruling is now assigned as error. The ground of motion was that before the filing of the information the defendant had not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.