Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1983No. Civ. 24263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Defendant Board of Medical Quality Assurance (BMQA) appeals from the judgment in favor of plaintiff James Dewitt Douglass, a licensed medical doctor. In challenging the judgment arising from two distinct courses of conduct by Douglass reflected in BMQA’s accusation filed in April 1978 and a supplemental accusation filed in January 1979, BMQA asks us to define the parameters of official conduct with respect to an entrapment defense and to decide the admissibility of hearsay evidence which forms the basis for an expert’s opinion the physician acted unprofessionally. We conclude…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Blinder, Robinson & Co. v. TomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. ArthurleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. SlattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. AlbanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API