Legal Opinion
Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 27, 1985No. C0-84-881PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
The primary issue in this case is whether a Minnesota licensed insurer of automobiles owned by nonresidents is liable under the Minnesota No-Fault Reparations Act (Minn.Stat. § 65B.47) for no-fault benefits when one of its insureds sustained personal injuries while in a Minnesota accident at a time she was operating a non-owned vehicle, and at a time one or more of the insured vehicles was not in the State of Minnesota. On motion for summary judgment, the trial judge held that it was. The Court of Appeals affirmed.1 We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.
On November…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. National Family Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.