Legal Opinion
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1984No. C5-84-214PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant State Farm Insurance Co. insured an automobile of Dorothy Archiletti, who was injured in a Minnesota car accident. The appeal is on a summary judgment requiring State Farm to pay a subro-gation claim of respondent Western National Mutual Insurance Co., the insurer for the vehicle occupied by Archiletti at the time of the accident.
Because Archiletti was a Missouri resident without a car in Minnesota when the accident occurred, State Farm contends she had no right to no-fault benefits under her own insurance policy. The contention is based on interpretation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hime v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Allstate Insurance v. SullamNew York Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Hoeschen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.