Legal Opinion
Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1987No. C0-85-2172PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Stuart Burniece (“Burniece”) was injured in an automobile accident on March 29, 1977. At the time of that accident, Bur-niece was the named insured under two policies of insurance issued by Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (“Illinois Farmers”). These policies provided income loss benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 8 (1984), which provides: “Disability and income loss benefits shall provide compensation for 85 percent of the injured person’s loss of present and future gross income from inability to work proximately caused by the nonfatal injury subject to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Record v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- General Mills, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq Computer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Zaretsky v. Molecular Biosystems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Johnson v. KromhoutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.