Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 2000No. C9-00-566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge

The district court ordered the parties, both insurers, to arbitrate and confirmed the arbitrators’ award to respondent. Because we see no error in the application of Minnesota law or in the award, we affirm.

FACTS

Mark Anderson was injured in Nevada when a semi-truck driven by Larry Thie-man rear-ended Anderson’s flatbed truck. Anderson, a Minnesota resident, was returning to Minnesota where his flatbed was principally garaged; he was insured by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm) under a policy issued in Minnesota. Pursuant to the Minnesota…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danielson v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API