Legal Opinion

Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1985No. C0-84-881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an action to determine the rights under an insurance policy. Continental appeals from the April 16, 1984 summary judgment which found Carmen Reed to be covered under the policy. Continental denies coverage, claiming Reed is not an insured under the policy because none of the Reed vehicles were licensed, garaged, or being operated in Minnesota at the time of the accident. Additionally, Continental denies coverage because the insured made a claim to another insurance company on a different priority level as defined in the No-Fault Act.

FACTS

This action arises out…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hoeschen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API