Legal Opinion
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 29, 2016No. A15-1174PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Appellant Founders Insurance Company challenges the district court’s confirmation of a no-fault arbitration award, contending that, because Founders is not licensed to write motor-vehicle insurance in this state, it is not obligated under Minnesota Statutes section 65B.50 to provide basic economic-loss benefits to its insured. Because we conclude that subdivision 2 of this section applies only to insurers that are, consistent with subdivision 1, licensed to write motor-vehicle insurance in Minnesota, we reverse.
FACTS
Shortly after moving to Minnesota from Illinois in late…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016