Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 2001No. C9-00-566PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
This case involves a dispute between two insurance companies regarding the Minnesota No Fault Automobile Insurance Act (“No Fault Act”) indemnification provision, which is contained in Minn.Stat. § 65B.53, subd. 1 (2000). Great West Casualty Company, the insurer of a Nebraska commercial trucking company, appeals from the court of appeals’ holding that section 65B.53, subdivision 1 requires Great West to indemnify State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for basic economic loss benefits State Farm paid to its Minnesota policyholder as a result of an accident that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Blamey Ex Rel. Blamey v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhartonNevada Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Progressive Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Ohio Savings Bank v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Lutheran Brotherhood Research Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Regenscheid v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.