Legal Opinion
Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 27, 1985No. C5-84-214PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Dorothy Archiletti owned an automobile(s) licensed, garaged, and insured in Missouri. State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) insured the Archiletti vehicle(s) in Missouri, a state which does not have an automobile no-fault reparations act. State Farm was licensed to write automobile insurance policies in Minnesota, but did not collect any premiums for no-fault coverage on the Archiletti policy. On September 30,1980, Dorothy Archiletti sustained personal injuries in a motor vehicle accident that occurred in Minnesota. At the time of the accident, she was an occupant of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. DeardorffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Epperson v. Dixie Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Nationwide Insurance v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Aguilar v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.