Legal Opinion

Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1978No. 48051, 48534PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

In each of these consolidated appeals, defendant insurance companies appeal from a summary judgment for the insured or insured’s representative in which the trial court “stacked” the maximum coverages for no-fault basic economic loss benefits under each of two applicable insurance policies permitting the insured to recover such no-fault benefits to the extent of actual losses up to the combined policy limits of both policies. In each case, the insurer contends that the stacking of two or more obligations to pay no-fault basic economic loss benefits is inconsistent with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Travelers Insurance v. LopezNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Pleitgen Ex Rel. Pleitgen v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API