Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boardman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1991No. OSB 89-42; SC S37916PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a disciplinary proceeding initiated by the Oregon State Bar, charging the accused with violating two different disciplinary rules. The trial panel found him not guilty. The Bar seeks review of the trial panel’s decision. We review de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. The Bar has the burden of establishing ethical misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. BR 5.2. We find the accused guilty of violating DR 1-102(A)(3) and DR 7-102(A)(5) and reprimand him.
FACTS
On October 4,1978, Leonard Winkler executed a will naming Howard R. Hedrick as the personal representative. That will provided that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HubertOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.