Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gustafson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1998No. OSB 95-34; SC S43937PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) seeks reversal of a decision by a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board. Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.5(a). The Bar alleges that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) (two counts). The trial panel concluded that the Bar failed to prove that the accused violated the disciplinary rules as charged and dismissed the Bar’s complaint.

This court reviews the trial panel’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API