In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Huffman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) by filing motions to waive or defer an appellate filing fee and the cost of preparing trial transcripts, and DR 1-103(C) by failing to respond fully and truthfully to inquiries from the Oregon State Bar (Bar). The trial panel imposed an 18-month suspension and required that the accused take and pass the professional responsibility portion of the bar examination before being reinstated to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FitzhenryOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WyllieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.