In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hubert
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the accused-is charged with knowingly and wilfully mis representing to the trial court the amount of money which he received as a fee from his client. The alleged misrepresentation was made under the following circumstances.
In the course of a pendente lite hearing in a divorce proceeding, Judge Harlow Lenon indicated that he would require the husband (who was represented by the accused) to pay $300 towards the wife’s attorney’s fees. The accused asserted that each party had sufficient liquid assets to pay his own attorney’s fees. Judge Lenon then…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Joseph v. MannixOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re James E. BrantOregon Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoardmanOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Romero-Barcelo v. Acevedo-VilaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, IrelandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.