Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hubert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the accused-is charged with knowingly and wilfully mis representing to the trial court the amount of money which he received as a fee from his client. The alleged misrepresentation was made under the following circumstances.

In the course of a pendente lite hearing in a divorce proceeding, Judge Harlow Lenon indicated that he would require the husband (who was represented by the accused) to pay $300 towards the wife’s attorney’s fees. The accused asserted that each party had sufficient liquid assets to pay his own attorney’s fees. Judge Lenon then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Joseph v. MannixOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re James E. BrantOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoardmanOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Romero-Barcelo v. Acevedo-VilaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, IrelandArizona Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API