Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boothe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1987No. OSB 85-34 and 85-93; SC S33511PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused is charged with six instances of professional misconduct arising out of his representation of two clients, Mary Damskov and Mark Hemstreet. He seeks review of the trial panel’s findings that he was guilty of five of those charges and its recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months. We find the accused guilty of violating former Disciplinary Rules 9-102(B)(3) and (4) (failing to account for property of a client; failure promptly to pay over to the client funds to which the client was entitled), 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Grievance Commission v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GermundsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re GildeaOregon Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API