In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boothe
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The accused is charged with six instances of professional misconduct arising out of his representation of two clients, Mary Damskov and Mark Hemstreet. He seeks review of the trial panel’s findings that he was guilty of five of those charges and its recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months. We find the accused guilty of violating former Disciplinary Rules 9-102(B)(3) and (4) (failing to account for property of a client; failure promptly to pay over to the client funds to which the client was entitled), 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Grievance Commission v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GermundsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re GildeaOregon Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.