In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hiller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar charges the accused attorneys with violating a statute and a disciplinary rule by making false, misleading and deceitful representations in support of a motion for summary judgment in circuit court. Because both the accused are partners in the same law firm and acted together in the events leading to the charges against them, the charges were consolidated in one proceeding with their consent. For clarity, we refer to each accused by name.
The facts are somewhat complicated but essentially undisputed, except for the accuseds’ defense that they acted without the culpable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Pachter v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by48 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.