Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hiller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1985No. 83-6; SC S30912PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar charges the accused attorneys with violating a statute and a disciplinary rule by making false, misleading and deceitful representations in support of a motion for summary judgment in circuit court. Because both the accused are partners in the same law firm and acted together in the events leading to the charges against them, the charges were consolidated in one proceeding with their consent. For clarity, we refer to each accused by name.

The facts are somewhat complicated but essentially undisputed, except for the accuseds’ defense that they acted without the culpable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pachter v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API