Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Devers
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1999No. OSB 93-175, 94-96; SC S39997PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused committed multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility, namely, disciplinary rules (DR) 1-102(A)(3) 1 and DR 3-101(B) 2 and suspended him from the practice of law for 15 months. Because that suspension was more than six months, this court automatically reviews the trial panel’s decision. ORS 9.536(2); Rule of Procedure (BR) 10.1. Our review is de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. On review, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) contends that the accused’s misconduct warrants disbarment. For the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Oregon State Bar v. Security Escrows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.