Legal Opinion
Bombero v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 9, 1996No. 13780PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiff appeals from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court refused to grant declaratory relief because it concluded that there was no actual controversy between the parties. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that he was not entitled to seek declaratory relief. We agree with the plaintiff and conclude that the plaintiff has shown the requisite degree of uncertainty as to his rights as a property owner, sufficient to entitle him to seek declaratory relief.
Certain facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff brought this…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Queach Corp. v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Durham Manufacturing Co. v. Merriam Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.