Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 13, 2001No. AC 19865PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*285 Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiffs, Perry Lewis, Basha Szymanska1 and Downington Manufacturing Company (Downington), appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Ridgefield (commission) to amend two sections of the Ridgefield subdivision regulations. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly found that the amendments neither classically nor statutorily aggrieved them and, therefore, improperly concluded that they lacked standing to maintain the appeal. We agree with the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Hall v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Stauton v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hayes Family Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Terese B. v. Commissioner of ChildrenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Trimar Equities, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Board of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.