Durham Manufacturing Co. v. Merriam Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, The Durham Manufacturing Company (“Durham”), has brought this environmental suit pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, et seq. (“CERCLA”), against Defendants, Merriam Manufacturing Company (“Merriam”), Allan E. Adams, and Aztec Industries, L.L.C. (“Aztec”), d/b/a American Metal Crafters, seeking to recover costs incurred in responding to soil and ground-water contamination allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances by Defendants. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- New York v. Town of ClarkstownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Carrier Corp. v. PiperDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- New York v. Next Millennium Realty, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.