Legal Opinion
Queach Corp. v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 25, 2001No. SC 16486PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires this court to address whether the regulatory amendments adopted by the named defendant inland wetlands commission of the town of Branford (commission) are valid under General Statutes §§ 22a-361 through *18122a-45* 2 of the Connecticut Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act (act). The plaintiffs, Queach Corporation and Vivian Vigliotti, appeal3 from the decision of the trial court, Blue, J., which held that the amended regulations implemented by the commission, the inland wetlands agency for the town of Branford (town),4 were valid. The plaintiffs claim that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands Commission of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Reid v. LandsbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Shukis v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF REGIONAL DIST.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.