Legal Opinion
Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 10, 1989No. 13403PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiffs, Robert and Catherine Cioffoletti, owners of a parcel of land in Ridgefield used for the mining and excavation of sand and gravel, appealed to the Superior Court after the defendant, the Ridgefield planning and zoning commission, acting as the town’s inland wetlands board, granted with certain modifications and conditions the plaintiffs’ application to expand their mining operation. The trial court dismissed the appeal, finding no infirmities in either the town’s regulations or the procedures that were followed. This appeal followed.
On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Savage v. AronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.