Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Pac
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1981PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment that General Statutes § 4-170, 1 permitting the legislature to veto administrative regulations, is unconstitutional. The plaintiff, Mary Maloney, brought an action against the state traffic commission and its members, and the city of Hartford and its acting city manager, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the legislative veto of action taken by the state traffic commission. The Legislative Regulation Review Committee of the legislature (LRRC) and the Balf Company were added as defendants by order of the trial court. The defendant city of Hartford…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.