Legal Opinion
Gohld Realty Co. v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1954PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
This reservation poses the question whether the Connecticut Redevelopment Act, chapter 55 of the General Statutes as amended by §§ 383c-390c of the 1953 Cumulative Supplement, is unconstitutional.
The stipulated facts out of which this controversy arises are the following: On April 24, 1950, the common council of the city of Hartford adopted the provisions of the Redevelopment Act and created a redevelopment agency. Arrangements were then made with the United States in accordance with the provisions of title 1 of the federal Housing Act of 1949 (63 Stat. 414, 42 U.S.C. § 1451 [Sup. 5, 1952])…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.