Pearson v. Parsons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This cause was heretofore before this court on an appeal by the defendant from a former judgment. (Pearson v. McKinney, 160 Cal. 649, [117 Pac. 919].) Upon that appeal the judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Afterward, S. J. Parsons was substituted as administrator of the deceased, Hendrick, and the complaint was amended. Thereupon another trial was had resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred dollars. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The first point urged by the appellant is that the court below erred in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lichtenberg v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ganceart v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Morehouse v. MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Alhambra Transfer & Storage Co. v. MuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Rolley, Inc. v. Merle Norman CosmeticsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Dugand v. MagnusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.