California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
The pertinent facts upon which this appeal depends are set forth in the opinion in the ease of California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc., ante, p. 323 [5 Pac. (2d) 478], this day filed in this court, and to which opinion for said facts reference may be had.
It appears that the greater criticism by the appellant of the judgment rendered by the lower court is leveled not only at the amount of fees allowed to the plaintiff for the attorneys who represented the plaintiff in the action, but as well at the conclusion that the appellant was at all liable for said attorney’s fees.
Bec…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- S.F. T. Seminary v. Monterey County G. & E. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Grace v. CroningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Smith v. WigetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Knowles v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
- EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971