Lichtenberg v. McGlynn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendants are the executors of the last will and testament of James M. Donahue, *47deceased, and after letters testamentary had heen issued to them the plaintiff presented to them a claim against the estate of their testator, which they rejected, and thereupon he began this action for the purpose of having the validity of his claim established. The claim was properly verified March 13, 1891, as follows:
“Estate of James M. Donahue, Deceased,
“To Wm. Lichtenberg, Dr.
“Nov. 20, 1890.
“ To services rendered by said William Lichtenberg for said deceased, at his special instance, within two years…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.