Legal Opinion
Dugand v. Magnus
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1930No. Docket No. 6991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above action was brought to recover from the estate of Eugene E. Magnus, deceased, certain rent which it was alleged the decedent was under obligation to pay.
The decedent was the lessee of an apartment under a written lease from Arthur J. Laib, the owner, for a term commencing August 1, 1925, and ending August 1, 1927. The lessee agreed to pay as rent therefor $165 per month except for six months of the term, namely, the months of December, 1925, February, March and December, 1926, and February and March, 1927, during which it was stipulated that he should enjoy the premises…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rising v. StannardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dover Mobile Estates v. Fiber Form Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Lesser v. PominCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Calidino Hotel Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Miller & Desatnik Management Co. v. BullockAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1990
- Paddock v. ClayMontana Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.