Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Carroll

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1895No. 15697PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, J udge. The facts are stated in tlie opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeal from the judgment, taken within sixty days from its rendition. The evidence is brought up for review by bill of exceptions.

Plaintiff presented his claim to the executors of the estate of R. T. Carroll, deceased, which claim was in form as follows:

“ The undersigned, creditor of the estate of R. T. Carroll, deceased, presents his claim against the estate of said deceased, with the necessary vouchers, for approval, as follows, to wit:

‘‘ Estate of R. T. Carroll, Deceased,

“To James 0. McGrath, Dr.”

The following are the particulars of said creditor’s claim:

“ San Francisco, March 20, 1891.
“…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Lichtenberg v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API