Ganceart v. Henry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The action was brought to have an absolute deed executed by plaintiff to defendant October 4, 1886, conveying a lot of land in the town of Alamo, county of Contra Costa, California, adjudged to be a mortgage, and to permit the plaintiff to redeem, and to require the defendant to execute a deed of conveyance to the plaintiff.
The complaint, in apt language, set out in substance that on the fourth day of October, 1886, defendant loaned him four hundred dollars, plaintiff to pay interest…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by23 opinions
- Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sheehy v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Todd v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.