Legal Opinion

Rolley, Inc. v. Merle Norman Cosmetics

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1954No. Civ. No. 16101PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

129 Cal.App.2d 844 (1954)

ROLLEY, INC., Appellant,

v.

MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 16101.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Two.

Dec. 29, 1954.

Joseph A. Brown and Harry Gottesfeld for Appellant.

Littler, Lauritzen & Mendelson, John B. Lauritzen and Warren H. Saltzman for Respondents.

DOOLING, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered from an order sustaining a demurrer to a third amended complaint without leave to amend.

[1a] The third amended complaint alleges the following: Defendant Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., (hereinafter referred to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Widdows v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. A. B. C. Distributing Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Centeno v. Roseville Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API