Legal Opinion

Tabata v. Murane

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1944No. L. A. 18889PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This action is on a creditor’s claim. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict awarding to plaintiff and against defendant as executor of the last will and 'testament of Charles W. Zorn, deceased, the sum of $8,838.43, being a portion of the amount claimed by plaintiff to have been due and owing to him by Zorn at the date of the latter’s death on May 16, 1941.

Among the various grounds urged by defendant as requiring a reversal of the judgment is error in instructing the jury. At least two of the given instructions contain errors which may well have been determinative of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Townsend v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. O'Meara v. SwortfiguerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sexton v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API