Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Tunxis Service Center
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 21, 1996No. 15249PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation review board (board) properly determined that the failure of a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) to issue his finding and award within 120 days of a hearing, as set forth in General Statutes § 31-300,1 did not invali*73date the commissioner’s decision. The plaintiff, Paul Stewart, appeals2 from a decision of the board concluding that (1) the commissioner’s decision was valid despite his failure to comply with the 120 day time period set forth in § 31-300, and (2) the plaintiff was not permanently and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Chairman, Criminal Justice Commission v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hillcrest AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Doe v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.