Legal Opinion
State v. Pare
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 2000No. SC 15931PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, Joseph Pare, was convicted, after a jury trial, of the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § dSa-ñia.1 Following two days of deliberations, the jury returned a guilty verdict and, in accordance with the trial court’s instructions, retired to the jury room to await the judge’s arrival so that he could speak with them further. Despite the defendant’s request to recall the jury to conduct a poll pursuant to Practice Book § 42-31,2 the trial court declined, and *613rendered judgment consistent with the verdict. This appeal followed.
This appeal raises several…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Ira Green, Inc. v. Military Sales & Service Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.