Legal Opinion

Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 2018No. SC 19878PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

**588The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the thirty day deadline provided by Practice Book § 11-21,1 which governs motions for attorney's fees, is directory rather than mandatory, thus affording a trial court discretion to entertain untimely motions. The plaintiff, Meadowbrook Center, Inc., a nursing facility, appeals, upon our grant of its petition for certification,2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the trial court, which denied as untimely a motion filed by the defendant, Robert Buchman, seeking an award of attorney's fees pursuant to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Joan M. Canfield v. Van Atta Buick/gmc Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Disturco v. Gates in New Canaan, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Wilton Campus 1691, LLC. v. WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FraboniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API