Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
**588The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the thirty day deadline provided by Practice Book § 11-21,1 which governs motions for attorney's fees, is directory rather than mandatory, thus affording a trial court discretion to entertain untimely motions. The plaintiff, Meadowbrook Center, Inc., a nursing facility, appeals, upon our grant of its petition for certification,2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the trial court, which denied as untimely a motion filed by the defendant, Robert Buchman, seeking an award of attorney's fees pursuant to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Joan M. Canfield v. Van Atta Buick/gmc Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Disturco v. Gates in New Canaan, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Wilton Campus 1691, LLC. v. WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FraboniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.