Legal Opinion
Winslow v. Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1956PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiffs, four in number, are taxpaying residents of the city of Stamford. The three defendants are the zoning board, hereinafter called the board, Arthur Y. Swinnerton, the board’s enforcement officer, and the Louis Paul in Stamford Corporation. In 1954, the board amended § 14 of the zoning regulations of the city. The plaintiffs appealed from that action to the Court of Common Pleas. The court dismissed the appeal, and from that judgment the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
The facts are undisputed. They may be stated as follows: On November 30,1951, the city of Stamford, acting…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Caires v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.