Legal Opinion
Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1993No. 14694PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether an appeal from the denial of a prejudgment remedy may be taken after the expiration of the seven day time period specified by General Statutes § 52-278l. The plaintiffs, Joseph Ambroise and Rosita Ambroise, made an application for a prejudgment remedy seeking an order, after a hearing, for the attachment of personal and real property owned by the defendants, William Raveis Real Estate, Inc., James Ero, Stephen Melillo and Marlene B. Melillo. The underlying cause of action claimed a right to damages arising out of the defendants’ alleged…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.