Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hillcrest Associates
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1995No. 15084PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive question in this case is whether the thirty day time limitation contained in General Statutes § 49-14 (a)1 is subject matter jurisdic*156tional. This and another question2 come to us upon certification by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Court of Appeals) pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199a and Practice Book § 4168.3 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hillcrest Associ*157ates, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 93-6372 (August 29, 1994). We conclude that the thirty day time limitation contained in § 49-14 (a) is not subject matter…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gore v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.