Legal Opinion
New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 1996No. 15235PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The named defendant, Bedford Realty Corporation (Bedford), appeals from a judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, GHR D.C., Inc. (GHR).1 Bedford claims that the trial court improperly: (1) admitted certain evidence at trial; (2) determined that the named plaintiff mortgagee was entitled to accelerate the mortgage debt; and (3) determined that GHR was not required to satisfy the requirements of General Statutes §§ 42a-3-301 and 42a-3-309,2 governing the enforcement of a lost instru*747ment. We reverse and remand the case to the trial court for a new…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.