Legal Opinion

Doe v. Statewide Grievance Committee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 6, 1997No. 15533PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the failure by the defendant, the statewide grievance committee (committee), to comply with the temporal requirements of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 51-90g (g)1 and Practice Book § 27J (i),2 deprives *673the defendant of subject matter jurisdiction to act on a grievance complaint alleging attorney misconduct and, further, deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction to exercise its inherent authority over attorney conduct. We conclude that it does not.

In June, 1993, misconduct charges against the plaintiff were brought…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API