Legal Opinion
Matey v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 12, 1991No. 8964PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
This is an appeal by the state second injury and compensation assurance fund (fund) from the denial of its motion to intervene and motion to open and set aside the denial.1
This case is related to Matey v. Estate of Dember, 210 Conn. 626, 556 A.2d 599 (1989), and the facts underlying both actions are as follows. The plaintiff, Mary Lou Matey, was injured in a two car accident in Waterbury on August 9, 1984. At the time of the accident, she was a home health care worker employed by an elderly woman, Sarah Dember, who died shortly after the accident. Although Matey was acting in the course of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.