Legal Opinion

Matey v. Estate of Dember

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1989No. 13592PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent Francisco Borges, who is the state treasurer and custodian of the state second injury and compensation assurance fund, has appealed from a decision of the compensation review division (CRD) affirming the finding of the workers’ compensation commissioner as to the liability of the respondent fund to the claimant, Mary Lou Matey, but remanding the case for further proceedings before the commissioner with respect to the amount of the workers’ compensation award. In his appeal the treasurer maintains that the CRD erred in concluding that the claimant was not barred from recovery by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Albert BrodkaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. United Fruit Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Herman G. HoffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Santos v. Publix Theatres CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API