Legal Opinion
Matey v. Estate of Dember
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 21, 2004No. AC 24266PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Mary Lou Matey, appeals from the judgment of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the board improperly calculated the applicable cost of living adjustments to her compensation rate, (2) the commissioner improperly placed a higher burden on her because the defendant second injury fund (fund) paid her benefits and (3) the commissioner improperly failed to award her statutorily required interest. We do not reach the substantive issues…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Gianetti v. NORWALK HOSP.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Bowden v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Fantasia v. Milford Fastening SystemsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.