Legal Opinion
Baker v. Cordisco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 11, 1995No. 12612PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) allowed the defendant to withdraw his third party *517complaint and file special defenses against the plaintiff, (2) admitted hearsay evidence that did not comply with the business entry exception enumerated in General Statutes § 52-180, (3) permitted a witness to testify to the ultimate issue that was to be decided by the jury, and (4) permitted a verdict that was contrary to the physical…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. HermannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.