Legal Opinion
Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1937PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
On November 25th, 1936, before this case came on for hearing, a “withdrawal of action” was filed, signed by both parties by their attorneys, stating that the action “is hereby withdrawn without further costs to either party.” On January 2d, 1937, the plaintiff, by other attorneys than the one who signed the withdrawal, filed a motion to restore the case to the docket, and on February 2d, 1937, the court granted the motion. The defendant has filed an appeal from the order restoring the case to the docket.
The granting by the trial court of the motion was not a final judgment from which an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Weisguth v. Supreme Tribe of Ben HurIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Glazer v. RosoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Hoey v. Investors' Mortgage & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Hoberman v. Lake of Isles, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.