Legal Opinion
Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 15, 2009No. AC 29743PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
This appeal arises out of a judgment rendered in accordance with a stipulation of the parties in which the plaintiff, Diamond 67, LLC (Diamond); the intervening plaintiff, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (plaintiffs unless otherwise stated); and the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Vernon, purported to settle this mandamus action pertaining to Diamond’s site plan application. The proposed interve-nor, Glenn Montigny, claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his renewed motion to intervene and (2) rendered judgment in accordance with the stipulated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Gambardella v. Apple Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Longley v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Jones v. RickerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Diamond 67, LLC v. OatisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Town of Griswold v. CamputaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Batchelder v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Dean-Moss Family Ltd. Partnership v. Five Mile River Works, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.