Legal Opinion
Pitchell v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 23, 1997No. AC 16267PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, John J. Pitchell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendant Gregory Sargis, a police officer in the city of Hartford, on the ground of insufficient service of process. The plaintiff also appeals from the decision of the trial court granting Sargis’ motion to open the default judgment entered on October 30, 1995. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to a determination of this case. The plaintiff, by writ, summons and complaint dated May 31, 1994, brought suit against Sargis,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Noethe v. NoetheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Resurreccion v. Normandy Heights, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997