Legal Opinion
Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 4, 1984No. 11911PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court, Maiocco, J., erred when it overruled the defendants’ objection to the plaintiff’s withdrawal of his complaint. The following salient facts are not in dispute: The plaintiff, Douglas Barra, filed a complaint on April 21,1982, seeking a judicial winding up of the defendant corporation, Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd. (Ridgefield), pursuant to General Statutes § 33-382. The plaintiff and the defendant Loretta O’Hare were shareholders and directors of Ridgefield. O’Hare then filed an application for appraisal of the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Steve Viglione Sheet Metal Co. v. SakonchickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. Tyler-BarcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.